PDA

View Full Version : The Dogg Pound - What was that?!



The Stig
04-06-2004, 09:05 PM
As a wrestling fan, I have had more than my share of raised eyebrows thrown at me when World Wrestling Entertainment decides to push the envelope. A lot of my friends, co-workers and colleagues watch RAW with me from time to time and wonder aloud why I watch 'this crap.'

It's fun entertainment, I would tell them. It's more than just two men or women in tights. It's about trying to tell a story and making it sell like any other television program.

But there are times when WWE puts out something so offensive, I have a very hard time explaining it to myself, let alone curious mainstream viewers. Mae Young giving birth to a hand, getting put through a table and taking her top off at a pay-per-view was certainly difficult to swallow, as well as that horrendous Katie Vick angle between Triple H and Kane we saw two years ago.

But on Monday, World Wrestling Entertainment hit an all-time creative low that I couldn't even explain to my shocked and sickened my girlfriend. As we all saw, William Regal was back on RAW (which was actually nice to see) and wanted to get back to work. RAW GM Eric Bischoff promised he would put him back on the roster if he would do him one favour - manage his nephew, Eugene Dinsmore.

Great, I thought! This was the chance to check out this new Nick Dinsmore character! But in my 10 years of watching wrestling I have seen some pretty eye-opening, jaw-dropping stuff, I was not prepared to see what was coming up next.

The character of Eugene Dinsmore was developmentally challenged.

The segment on TV which saw Dinsmore do the Bushwacker dance and lick Jerry Lawler was so tasteless and unfunny I couldn't even bear to look at the television screen.

Forget that stupid sugar-coated garbage Bischoff said about his nephew being 'special.' We are not that stupid. To my utter shock and disgust, some writer in the back actually thought it would be funny to promote a developmentally challenged wrestler. Isn't it ironic that this is coming from a company that once expressed anger and outrage when Vince Russo introduced WCW's Oklahoma - a Jim Ross-inspired character who twisted his mouth mocking Ross's real life battle with Bell's Palsy?

As wrestling fans, we pay good money to go to live events and interact with the stars. In return, the stars give us every opportunity to cheer or boo them. The heroes we like tend to come out, give fans high-fives and go for cheap pops by mentioning the city they are in. The heels will look for anything to get a negative buzz. They'll knock on how ugly the men and women are in the audience or call us fat, lazy, cowards. Thats fine by us. We usually respond appropriately.

But what we saw on Monday night was something different. Dinsmore's character was an unfair carricature that made a complete mockery of people in this world who are trying hard every day to live their lives. They have substantial limitations in self-care, receptive and expressive language, learning, mobility, self-direction, capacity for independent living and economic self-sufficiency. I do not envy the obstacles that developmentally challenged people have to go through and have nothing but respect for the fact that they are trying so hard to live their lives just like everyone else should.

What we saw on Monday night wasn't entertainment or comedy. It was an unprovoked attack by WWE on people who, more often than not, do not have a voice to stand up for themselves.

What makes this even more heart-breaking is the fact that the very group of people that Dinsmore's character was belittling make up a very important part of WWE's fan base.

And the Dinsmore gimmick was a total slap in their faces.

Now I'm sure there are some of you out there who thought Eugene Dinsmore was hilarious and that I'm taking this way too seriously with some holier-than-thou approach. That's fine, because as a WWE fan, you are entitled to like or dislike whatever you see.

But if that's the case, let me make just one simple request - take a really good look at the other side of the story.

The next time you go to a WWE event - whether it be a live show or a meet-and-greet- take a quick peek to see if these wonderful fans are in attendance. Look at the sheer joy in their faces when they get to see their real-live superheroes in action.

So how funny is Eugene Dinsmore now? Not funny enough for me to keep watching him.

K-Dogg

The Pez
04-06-2004, 09:15 PM
A great read K-Dogg

I agree with (almost) everything you had to say about Dinsmore's character. Give it time though, let it develop.

Duff
04-06-2004, 10:04 PM
I agree. From what i gather the character is pretty similarto Mary'sbrother (cant remember his name) in "There's something about Mary." Seems pretty sick to try and use this to get a character over because of the sympathy vote. But it isnt something that surprises me, this is WWE after all.


oh yeah, good work on the column

JDog
04-06-2004, 10:46 PM
I dont see a problem with it,in fact I found it quite amusing, as I see it as a rip off of the George "the animal" Steele gimmick, there is basically no difference


I see your point, but the problem is society these days take everything to damn seriously, instead of realising that its only entertainment, nobody complains when someone plays a mentally challenged person in a movie or TV show, and this is no different, its all entertainment

Drunkacho
04-07-2004, 02:03 AM
I dont see a problem with it,in fact I found it quite amusing, as I see it as a rip off of the George "the animal" Steele gimmick, there is basically no difference


I see your point, but the problem is society these days take everything to damn seriously, instead of realising that its only entertainment, nobody complains when someone plays a mentally challenged person in a movie or TV show, and this is no different, its all entertainment

JD brings up a good point, (as usual) people do take things way too seriously. But unfortunately I can't add really anything to this discussion seeing as I don't get to watch RAW until Friday so I guess I'll enquire with you guys about this.

Is there any point in me watching this 'segment' of RAW? The only good thing I could see happening is the return of Regal and by the way K-Dogg described it the whole thing seems to go downhill from there.

Chazz
04-07-2004, 01:27 PM
Excellent read K-Dogg. I knew when Bishcoff said that his nephew was "special" that it meant Eugene was handicapped in some way. I too have a hard time understanding some of the stories the WWE puts on the air. The father-daughter match almost made me quit watching the WWE altogether. I know that sounds extreme, but that is how I felt. I don't like this Eugene story either, but I will admit that I am wondering just how creative is going to handle it.

Cena316
04-08-2004, 06:04 PM
K-Dogg i see what you are saying..And i agree with you to a certain point..let me start off with the first thing you said..I find it hard as well to explain to people who dont watch wrestling why a guy is hitting another guy in the head with a chair..or why a 90 year old women just gave brith to a freakin hand.. i have to try and make somehting up to make this person understand..

Now on to the next thing you are talking about.. Nick Dinsmore playing a mentally reatarded person or a "special" person.. When I was at Wrestlemania XX i cant count how many people i saw in Wheel chairs and People who couldnt talk on their own.. And people who couldnt walk because their brains were vegetables and thye didnt function.. And those people were enjoying the hell out of theirselves.. Now had Nick Dinsmore been at mania with the Eugene Gimick i dont know if they would have been laughing.. i think they may have connected with him.. They may think hey he's a wrestler and he is just like me.. A lot of people liek that look up to Celebrities escpecially wrestlers...They look up to them even more than normal people do...And so i think they would see that if a celebrity is like that then they may not feel as bad about themselves..

Also bringing up what somebody else said about Mentally Challenged people in moves..Thats one hting i see more than anything.. Perfect example.. i dont know how many of you saw I AM Sam but Sean Penn did an excellent job playing a mentally challenged person..Nobody had anything negative to say about that.. but then you get Nick Dinsmore "acting" as a mentally Challenged persont hen you have finger pointing and critism...See if something happens in other forms of entertainment then it fine.. but if it happen is "Sports Entertaiment" then its wrong and it mocking people..i just dont understand.. Its like peopel are saying its ok to pretend to be a mentally challenged person in a movie but its not ok to play a mentally challenged person in a Wrestling show.. Because really the only difference between Wrestling and movies is Wrestling is in fornt of a live audience every week.. There is still Acting in both, There is still violence in both, there is still bad language in both,If a movie does something controversial then its ok.. but if Wrestling does something controversial then oh my god they have committed a sin.. I dont see somebody calling the cops or filing a lawsuit when somebody gets murdered on a movie.. but you make reference to somebody dying on wrestling and then you get sued or made fun of.. I dont think that is right..therefore i dont see a difference in Wrestling and movies....