Scorch
04-17-2009, 12:18 AM
You once knew him as the man surrounded by puppets, then you knew him as the longest reigning Florida State Champion, he is a former WPW Tag Team Champion, and the winner of the 2009 Brawl For It All. Now as he prepares for the biggest match of his career, Martin Cameron sits down with fictional Scottish interviewer Colin MacClennan, to talk about the big match, his feelings on winning the brawl, how he judges rp battles, who he sees as ones to watch, his rise to the top of the card and much more.
MacClennan: Let us jump right into it, as just mentioned you are the number one contender to the WPW Championship, and will get your title shot in a triple threat match with The Stallion and the current champion The Killing Joke at Redemption III, how do you feel knowing you are one win away from being the WPW Champion?
Martin Cameron: Wow, still sounds weird hearing people say that haha. To be honest, I still don't think it has really sunk in yet that I'm so close to it. I know a lot of people didn't exactly agree with the decision for the Brawl winner (and to be honest neither did I), so the question of whether or not I actually deserve it is constantly on my mind. The fact that my RPing has suffered due to my school work (and my laziness) of late doesn't help much either... But I'm starting to get that feeling back where I really enjoy being a part of WPW, so hopefully I'll soon be putting out roleplays with as much enthusiasm as I used to. I'm honest though, I've always been at my best when I thought the odds were stacked against me so when it finally does hit me that I'm facing the HBK and Ken at Redemption, I'll probably be too afraid not to start roleplaying my best!
MacClennan: You mentioned there that there was controversy about your Brawl win, going as far as to say you did not agree with the call to put you over in the match. Who then in your eyes should have been the one in your spot, who would Martin Cameron have pegged to win the Brawl?
Martin Cameron: I know that I would have liked Gunnar to win, I know that much for sure. I've always been a fan of Gunnar's and, if I remember correctly, I felt his second RP in that match was one of (if not the) best of his. But his first roleplay was sort of on the opposite end of the scale, so I unfortunately didn't really see him winning the match. But as far as who should have won is concerned, I don't think I could really judge that, the RP battle was far too brilliant. I didn't envy Ken at all!
MacClennan: Another bit of controversy happened at the Brawl when The Stallion was given a win over The Killing Joke, but not the title and as a result, Stallion got his chance to get into the Redemption III main event. Now you both spoke out of your belief the Redemption III main event should be one on one, but also that Stallion deserved another chance, would you care to elaborate more on the issue?
Martin Cameron: Regarding the WPW Title match at the Brawl, it wasn't an easy choice to make. The RP battle was extremely close and it was clear that HBK put a lot of effort and dedication in to the match but with Ken having been pretty much in control of HBK the entire RP battle, it seemed impossible to give Stallion the win. This, and the fact that the majority of people I asked said Stallion lost, lead me to the decision that there was no way Stallion could walk out the WPW Champion... But I felt as though HBK did more than enough in that RP battle to keep himself in the World Title picture. (The more than anyone in the Brawl did) Knowing that if I wrote a clean finish for Killing Joke with him beating Stallion and retaining the belt then Stallion would be pushed under the rug to let the Brawl winner move in, I felt I had to do something to keep him in the picture. I was pretty much decided on making Stallion win the match (but not the title) via count-out when the result came in that I apparently won the Brawl. This eliminated any worry of having the Brawl winner being angry at their limelight being stolen. I know at the time I wasn't happy with the decision, but it was what I felt was best... And looking back I'm happy I did it. I know that pretty much nobody liked the story at the time but I will happily stand up now and say that I'm proud of it. It has produced a brilliant storyline between KJ, Cameron and Stallion as well as making what is potentially the best Redemption main event so far. Not to mention the fact that people will remember it.
MacClennan: he Killing Joke will had at least a share of the WPW title for over 8 months by the time you get your shot at him, why do you think he has held the belt for so long?
Martin Cameron: I don't know about any of his past challengers, but the main reason I'm so worried about facing him is that I honestly have no bloody idea how to RP against the guy. Ken has his own style, one that he has perfected and it seems as though no one has been able to combat that well enough to secure a clear win against him in a title match. That, and Ken is smart. Very smart. I think that is something people in the past might have over-looked and let their guard down when they found out they were facing a clown. Sure, he's a funny guy but Ken has the ability to make you walk in to his traps. (See his match against Stallion at the Brawl)
MacClennan: It may help ease your worries to know that its actually only been about 6 months since Ken won the belt and he has only defeated Dan Murph in a title match since then. How do you plan to avoid getting caught in a trap, do you simply ignore him or try to get the advantage early?
Martin Cameron: God only knows, I'll kill of my pregnant wife or something.
MacClennan: You and Stallion both represent new blood into the WPW main event scene, do you feel you guys are at the same level writing wise as past main-eventers or do you think you guys are there more based on a mix of hard work and a need for new blood and fresh talent in the scene?
Martin Cameron: We're part of the next generation. I'm not sure where you plan to head with Scorch right now, but when guys like Prom and APG decide they've had enough of the World Title scene and step down to simply have a good old RP battle, someone else needs to step up fill their shoes... And that's when people turn to guys like Stallion and myself. But I don't think it's down to just that. If JMC or Scorch or One were champion then Stallion and I would still be in pretty much the same spot we are right now if you ask me. Hell, Ken is champion right now and he's hardly new to this thing. Stallion and I are new to this top tier, yes, but we have been at this for years and we've worked our way up every greased rung on the ladder to get here. With or without the originals at the top, I think we would still be right here today, ready to move up and challenge their legacy.
MacClennan: Given that WPW is meant to be a competitive based writing fed, do you think your progression is owed more to your getting better, or the guys at the top, remaining stagnant or declining in quality?
Martin Cameron: I don't think the guys at the top ever went downhill or stale, but like I said a few have decided to part ways with the title scene and we're all well aware that a lot of people have left WPW all together. But more than anything, more than that, I think it's down to improvement. 4 years ago I was writing roleplays about a character that was essentially Goldust who had a pet lizard with whom he had a sexual relationship with. I think I've improved, even if it just a little.
MacClennan: Alright we will get back to more elaborate questions soon, but for now would you care to take a brief detour into some word association?
Martin Cameron: It sounds delightful.
MacClennan: The One.
Martin Cameron: WPW Legend.
MacClennan: James Moriarty Cassius.
Martin Cameron: Biggest name in WPW.
MacClennan: The Killing Joke.
Martin Cameron: Terrifying opponent.
MacClennan: The Stallion.
Martin Cameron: Very deserving of the recognition he's gotten recently.
MacClennan: The Judge.
Martin Cameron: Sorta like a more-loved Jesus Christ.
MacClennan: Overrated.
Martin Cameron: Once upon a time I would have said Dan Murph, but I don't think that any more. I've seen what Dan can do on a good day.
MacClennan: Gunnar Brian.
Martin Cameron: Better lose that bloody Florida title soon before he beats my record.
MacClennan: Sal Karver.
Martin Cameron: I've always seen him as a Matt Hardy sort of guy. Always worked well with his partner but he started to shine when he came out of the tag team division. Now that he's back in it again, I'm a little dissapointed. I felt Sal was about to break through the proverbial glass ceiling but that's somewhat hard to do with the tag belts.
MacClennan: Mike Adams.
Martin Cameron: Uninteresting.
MacClennan: Underrated.
Martin Cameron: These days? No one really. I think Sal is someone with the potential to be a lot more than he is, but I wouldn't put the fact that he hasn't become that yet down to people underrating him.
MacClennan: Van Risen.
Martin Cameron: Kicking a little too much ass for a Canadian champion.
MacClennan: Champion.
Martin Cameron: My goal. Really getting hyped up for Redemption, and I'm looking to come away with the belt.
MacClennan: Scorch.
Martin Cameron: Seems to make his way to the WPW Title soon after returns and is probably the favourite to win the SYS match at Redemption, so I unfortunately might have to contend with him in the future.
MacClennan: Puppets.
Martin Cameron: Awesomeness. I hope to return them one day, even if it is just in a cameo spot. I'd get a real kick out of it.
MacClennan: Jamie Parker.
Martin Cameron: His career had a few parallels with mine, what with Parker and I being the only Flo-Tag champions in history and both winning the Florida Champ of the respective year. I've always wanted to face him, but Duff is too afraid because he knows I'm the better him!
MacClennan: Next.
Martin Cameron: If I win the World title? Try and be a better World Champion than I was Florida champion. If I lose? Go back for more. Even if I have to fight another 4 years for it.
MacClennan: Thank you for playing Word Association, unfortunately we ran out of plasma TVs, so instead enjoy these additional questions.
Martin Cameron: I hope they're HD Ready.
MacClennan: How should an rp battle be judged?
Martin Cameron: Well, I've heard of people attributing ratings and numbers to RPs in order to come up with a solution for who wins the match but I've always felt that as soon as you start doing that, you take all the fun out of reading an RP battle. I'm not really sure how to describe how you choose the better RP other than saying you choose the better RP. It can depend on the quality of writing, the overall impact of the RP, the realism, how well it was able to draw you, how well it argued a point, whether or not it worked on the opponent, if it had a good storyline etc. Theres a great number of factors, but in simple terms I usually just read an RP battle and declare the winner as who I felt was most deserving based on the effect the RPs had on me. (If one RP can really draw me in and make me believe what I'm reading, while the other simply says "Blah Blah My opponent is gay" then I know which one I'd pick).
MacClennan: Different people have different styles of approaching rp battles, is there a right way to handle them?
Martin Cameron: I think it all really depends on the RPers in question. With someone like Ken, who's roleplays are mainly comical, I usually tend to favour the more traditional style of RP despite me finding his promos funny. I've given Ken many a losses because his opponent's have been simply better written and drawn me in to believing the role play rather than making me chuckle. But on occasion that can be totally shattered, like in the case of the Brawl World Title match. I went in to that assuming Stallion would walk out the new champion but Ken managed to end up controlling Stallion with his own storyline throughout the battle. Like I said earlier, Ken's a smart guy and he was able to trap HBK619 in such a way that compelled me to give Killing Joke the win. I guess my point is that there's no real set formula for judging all RP battles. I just go in to the thread, try and dive in to the world of roleplays and see which RPer convinced me then deserved to win. Though I do tend to ask for other peoples opinions on most matches, just to make sure.
MacClennan: Is it important to you that people like you?
Martin Cameron: I'd be lying if I said I wasn't hurt in the past when I've heard certain things said about me in this fed but I've matured a lot since I first joined PCW and I think I'm able to handle anything people give me quite well. On the odd occassion I might have a little rant about to Dan or something but I rarely take it to the person in question's face and make a deal about it now-a-days. Plus I like to annoy Dan with my bitching.
MacClennan: How should the deadline be handled?
Martin Cameron: I've made strong posts in the staff room in the past about this and I'm pretty against post-deadline role plays being counted. I know certain guys have been known to accept roleplays right up until they've finished writing their match (which is usually well over 12 hours after deadline) but I've always been in the mind that a deadline is there for a reason. It might be harsh to deny someone who posts an hour or so after the deadline a win, but it would even harsher on their opponent to count it. Knowing that I defended the, once mine, Florida State title quite some time ago against someone who's post-deadline RP was counted angered me a lot. Sure, I won even despite this RP being counted but it was several hours after the deadline and if I had actually lost the belt because of that roleplay I would have been extremely pissed off. Deadlines are deadlines.
MacClennan: Was the Blade situation handled properly?
Martin Cameron: Some people over-reacted during the incident but I think Blade being banned from WPW was an appropriate punishment, yes. I was one of the people that stood up for him after his first "offence" so I was naturally quite angry to find out he had not only done it again, but also stolen from us to post elsewhere. He was given more than one chance and he let us down, his punishment was just.
MacClennan: Is there anybody in the fed you dislike and if so does it effect anything you do in the fed?
Martin Cameron: Well, I've had my differences with some people in the past that's for sure. There were times when I really disliked Dan, but now he's one of the people I talk to most from the forums. And, as I'm sure people know, I used to pretty much hate APG... But we ended up being tag team partners. I'll admit that in more recent times there have been one or two people that have bugged me a little but I'm not willing to argue to let it turn in to anything more.
MacClennan: Why is it nothing with Team Super Awesome seemed to go according to plan and do you feel the concept was a success?
Martin Cameron: The only thing that went wrong with our "plan" was that Sudden Impact were so unreliable that they actually lost to us. The plan was simple: challenge Sudden Impact, RP with a few mildly amusing roleplays and have Mike and Chris kick our asses. That, my friend, is the only part that didn't go according to "plan". Chris and Mike no-showed, leaving TSA to actually win the belts. Though I had considered this might happen, and the plan for this was simple: Team Super Awesome Transition Champions. I fail to see what part of that plan went wrong. We got the belts off a terrible team and lead them to a good one. If it wasn't for me pitching TSA, and if it wasn't for me having the weekly TSA open invitational we probably wouldn't have the great team of Risen & Karver.
MacClennan: Beyond your main event match what contest are you most looking forward to at Redemption III?
Be sure to check back for the exciting conclusion of Colin MacClennan’s exclusive interview with Martin Cameron. Coming soon to the end of this post in this thread on these forums near you.
MacClennan: Let us jump right into it, as just mentioned you are the number one contender to the WPW Championship, and will get your title shot in a triple threat match with The Stallion and the current champion The Killing Joke at Redemption III, how do you feel knowing you are one win away from being the WPW Champion?
Martin Cameron: Wow, still sounds weird hearing people say that haha. To be honest, I still don't think it has really sunk in yet that I'm so close to it. I know a lot of people didn't exactly agree with the decision for the Brawl winner (and to be honest neither did I), so the question of whether or not I actually deserve it is constantly on my mind. The fact that my RPing has suffered due to my school work (and my laziness) of late doesn't help much either... But I'm starting to get that feeling back where I really enjoy being a part of WPW, so hopefully I'll soon be putting out roleplays with as much enthusiasm as I used to. I'm honest though, I've always been at my best when I thought the odds were stacked against me so when it finally does hit me that I'm facing the HBK and Ken at Redemption, I'll probably be too afraid not to start roleplaying my best!
MacClennan: You mentioned there that there was controversy about your Brawl win, going as far as to say you did not agree with the call to put you over in the match. Who then in your eyes should have been the one in your spot, who would Martin Cameron have pegged to win the Brawl?
Martin Cameron: I know that I would have liked Gunnar to win, I know that much for sure. I've always been a fan of Gunnar's and, if I remember correctly, I felt his second RP in that match was one of (if not the) best of his. But his first roleplay was sort of on the opposite end of the scale, so I unfortunately didn't really see him winning the match. But as far as who should have won is concerned, I don't think I could really judge that, the RP battle was far too brilliant. I didn't envy Ken at all!
MacClennan: Another bit of controversy happened at the Brawl when The Stallion was given a win over The Killing Joke, but not the title and as a result, Stallion got his chance to get into the Redemption III main event. Now you both spoke out of your belief the Redemption III main event should be one on one, but also that Stallion deserved another chance, would you care to elaborate more on the issue?
Martin Cameron: Regarding the WPW Title match at the Brawl, it wasn't an easy choice to make. The RP battle was extremely close and it was clear that HBK put a lot of effort and dedication in to the match but with Ken having been pretty much in control of HBK the entire RP battle, it seemed impossible to give Stallion the win. This, and the fact that the majority of people I asked said Stallion lost, lead me to the decision that there was no way Stallion could walk out the WPW Champion... But I felt as though HBK did more than enough in that RP battle to keep himself in the World Title picture. (The more than anyone in the Brawl did) Knowing that if I wrote a clean finish for Killing Joke with him beating Stallion and retaining the belt then Stallion would be pushed under the rug to let the Brawl winner move in, I felt I had to do something to keep him in the picture. I was pretty much decided on making Stallion win the match (but not the title) via count-out when the result came in that I apparently won the Brawl. This eliminated any worry of having the Brawl winner being angry at their limelight being stolen. I know at the time I wasn't happy with the decision, but it was what I felt was best... And looking back I'm happy I did it. I know that pretty much nobody liked the story at the time but I will happily stand up now and say that I'm proud of it. It has produced a brilliant storyline between KJ, Cameron and Stallion as well as making what is potentially the best Redemption main event so far. Not to mention the fact that people will remember it.
MacClennan: he Killing Joke will had at least a share of the WPW title for over 8 months by the time you get your shot at him, why do you think he has held the belt for so long?
Martin Cameron: I don't know about any of his past challengers, but the main reason I'm so worried about facing him is that I honestly have no bloody idea how to RP against the guy. Ken has his own style, one that he has perfected and it seems as though no one has been able to combat that well enough to secure a clear win against him in a title match. That, and Ken is smart. Very smart. I think that is something people in the past might have over-looked and let their guard down when they found out they were facing a clown. Sure, he's a funny guy but Ken has the ability to make you walk in to his traps. (See his match against Stallion at the Brawl)
MacClennan: It may help ease your worries to know that its actually only been about 6 months since Ken won the belt and he has only defeated Dan Murph in a title match since then. How do you plan to avoid getting caught in a trap, do you simply ignore him or try to get the advantage early?
Martin Cameron: God only knows, I'll kill of my pregnant wife or something.
MacClennan: You and Stallion both represent new blood into the WPW main event scene, do you feel you guys are at the same level writing wise as past main-eventers or do you think you guys are there more based on a mix of hard work and a need for new blood and fresh talent in the scene?
Martin Cameron: We're part of the next generation. I'm not sure where you plan to head with Scorch right now, but when guys like Prom and APG decide they've had enough of the World Title scene and step down to simply have a good old RP battle, someone else needs to step up fill their shoes... And that's when people turn to guys like Stallion and myself. But I don't think it's down to just that. If JMC or Scorch or One were champion then Stallion and I would still be in pretty much the same spot we are right now if you ask me. Hell, Ken is champion right now and he's hardly new to this thing. Stallion and I are new to this top tier, yes, but we have been at this for years and we've worked our way up every greased rung on the ladder to get here. With or without the originals at the top, I think we would still be right here today, ready to move up and challenge their legacy.
MacClennan: Given that WPW is meant to be a competitive based writing fed, do you think your progression is owed more to your getting better, or the guys at the top, remaining stagnant or declining in quality?
Martin Cameron: I don't think the guys at the top ever went downhill or stale, but like I said a few have decided to part ways with the title scene and we're all well aware that a lot of people have left WPW all together. But more than anything, more than that, I think it's down to improvement. 4 years ago I was writing roleplays about a character that was essentially Goldust who had a pet lizard with whom he had a sexual relationship with. I think I've improved, even if it just a little.
MacClennan: Alright we will get back to more elaborate questions soon, but for now would you care to take a brief detour into some word association?
Martin Cameron: It sounds delightful.
MacClennan: The One.
Martin Cameron: WPW Legend.
MacClennan: James Moriarty Cassius.
Martin Cameron: Biggest name in WPW.
MacClennan: The Killing Joke.
Martin Cameron: Terrifying opponent.
MacClennan: The Stallion.
Martin Cameron: Very deserving of the recognition he's gotten recently.
MacClennan: The Judge.
Martin Cameron: Sorta like a more-loved Jesus Christ.
MacClennan: Overrated.
Martin Cameron: Once upon a time I would have said Dan Murph, but I don't think that any more. I've seen what Dan can do on a good day.
MacClennan: Gunnar Brian.
Martin Cameron: Better lose that bloody Florida title soon before he beats my record.
MacClennan: Sal Karver.
Martin Cameron: I've always seen him as a Matt Hardy sort of guy. Always worked well with his partner but he started to shine when he came out of the tag team division. Now that he's back in it again, I'm a little dissapointed. I felt Sal was about to break through the proverbial glass ceiling but that's somewhat hard to do with the tag belts.
MacClennan: Mike Adams.
Martin Cameron: Uninteresting.
MacClennan: Underrated.
Martin Cameron: These days? No one really. I think Sal is someone with the potential to be a lot more than he is, but I wouldn't put the fact that he hasn't become that yet down to people underrating him.
MacClennan: Van Risen.
Martin Cameron: Kicking a little too much ass for a Canadian champion.
MacClennan: Champion.
Martin Cameron: My goal. Really getting hyped up for Redemption, and I'm looking to come away with the belt.
MacClennan: Scorch.
Martin Cameron: Seems to make his way to the WPW Title soon after returns and is probably the favourite to win the SYS match at Redemption, so I unfortunately might have to contend with him in the future.
MacClennan: Puppets.
Martin Cameron: Awesomeness. I hope to return them one day, even if it is just in a cameo spot. I'd get a real kick out of it.
MacClennan: Jamie Parker.
Martin Cameron: His career had a few parallels with mine, what with Parker and I being the only Flo-Tag champions in history and both winning the Florida Champ of the respective year. I've always wanted to face him, but Duff is too afraid because he knows I'm the better him!
MacClennan: Next.
Martin Cameron: If I win the World title? Try and be a better World Champion than I was Florida champion. If I lose? Go back for more. Even if I have to fight another 4 years for it.
MacClennan: Thank you for playing Word Association, unfortunately we ran out of plasma TVs, so instead enjoy these additional questions.
Martin Cameron: I hope they're HD Ready.
MacClennan: How should an rp battle be judged?
Martin Cameron: Well, I've heard of people attributing ratings and numbers to RPs in order to come up with a solution for who wins the match but I've always felt that as soon as you start doing that, you take all the fun out of reading an RP battle. I'm not really sure how to describe how you choose the better RP other than saying you choose the better RP. It can depend on the quality of writing, the overall impact of the RP, the realism, how well it was able to draw you, how well it argued a point, whether or not it worked on the opponent, if it had a good storyline etc. Theres a great number of factors, but in simple terms I usually just read an RP battle and declare the winner as who I felt was most deserving based on the effect the RPs had on me. (If one RP can really draw me in and make me believe what I'm reading, while the other simply says "Blah Blah My opponent is gay" then I know which one I'd pick).
MacClennan: Different people have different styles of approaching rp battles, is there a right way to handle them?
Martin Cameron: I think it all really depends on the RPers in question. With someone like Ken, who's roleplays are mainly comical, I usually tend to favour the more traditional style of RP despite me finding his promos funny. I've given Ken many a losses because his opponent's have been simply better written and drawn me in to believing the role play rather than making me chuckle. But on occasion that can be totally shattered, like in the case of the Brawl World Title match. I went in to that assuming Stallion would walk out the new champion but Ken managed to end up controlling Stallion with his own storyline throughout the battle. Like I said earlier, Ken's a smart guy and he was able to trap HBK619 in such a way that compelled me to give Killing Joke the win. I guess my point is that there's no real set formula for judging all RP battles. I just go in to the thread, try and dive in to the world of roleplays and see which RPer convinced me then deserved to win. Though I do tend to ask for other peoples opinions on most matches, just to make sure.
MacClennan: Is it important to you that people like you?
Martin Cameron: I'd be lying if I said I wasn't hurt in the past when I've heard certain things said about me in this fed but I've matured a lot since I first joined PCW and I think I'm able to handle anything people give me quite well. On the odd occassion I might have a little rant about to Dan or something but I rarely take it to the person in question's face and make a deal about it now-a-days. Plus I like to annoy Dan with my bitching.
MacClennan: How should the deadline be handled?
Martin Cameron: I've made strong posts in the staff room in the past about this and I'm pretty against post-deadline role plays being counted. I know certain guys have been known to accept roleplays right up until they've finished writing their match (which is usually well over 12 hours after deadline) but I've always been in the mind that a deadline is there for a reason. It might be harsh to deny someone who posts an hour or so after the deadline a win, but it would even harsher on their opponent to count it. Knowing that I defended the, once mine, Florida State title quite some time ago against someone who's post-deadline RP was counted angered me a lot. Sure, I won even despite this RP being counted but it was several hours after the deadline and if I had actually lost the belt because of that roleplay I would have been extremely pissed off. Deadlines are deadlines.
MacClennan: Was the Blade situation handled properly?
Martin Cameron: Some people over-reacted during the incident but I think Blade being banned from WPW was an appropriate punishment, yes. I was one of the people that stood up for him after his first "offence" so I was naturally quite angry to find out he had not only done it again, but also stolen from us to post elsewhere. He was given more than one chance and he let us down, his punishment was just.
MacClennan: Is there anybody in the fed you dislike and if so does it effect anything you do in the fed?
Martin Cameron: Well, I've had my differences with some people in the past that's for sure. There were times when I really disliked Dan, but now he's one of the people I talk to most from the forums. And, as I'm sure people know, I used to pretty much hate APG... But we ended up being tag team partners. I'll admit that in more recent times there have been one or two people that have bugged me a little but I'm not willing to argue to let it turn in to anything more.
MacClennan: Why is it nothing with Team Super Awesome seemed to go according to plan and do you feel the concept was a success?
Martin Cameron: The only thing that went wrong with our "plan" was that Sudden Impact were so unreliable that they actually lost to us. The plan was simple: challenge Sudden Impact, RP with a few mildly amusing roleplays and have Mike and Chris kick our asses. That, my friend, is the only part that didn't go according to "plan". Chris and Mike no-showed, leaving TSA to actually win the belts. Though I had considered this might happen, and the plan for this was simple: Team Super Awesome Transition Champions. I fail to see what part of that plan went wrong. We got the belts off a terrible team and lead them to a good one. If it wasn't for me pitching TSA, and if it wasn't for me having the weekly TSA open invitational we probably wouldn't have the great team of Risen & Karver.
MacClennan: Beyond your main event match what contest are you most looking forward to at Redemption III?
Be sure to check back for the exciting conclusion of Colin MacClennan’s exclusive interview with Martin Cameron. Coming soon to the end of this post in this thread on these forums near you.